Civility
went south fast in Monday's debate. Donald Trump lost his composure
early, ranting, interrupting (over 20 times) and sniffing. (Under the
weather, or out of his comfort zone?) Hillary Clinton started out soft,
playing the grandmother card, but quickly escalated to tough talk and
occasional sarcasm. It could hardly have gone otherwise. Clinton hit
hard at Trump, bringing up his admiration of Russian President Vladimir
Putin, his "long record of engaging in racist behavior," his denial at
having supported the Iraq war, and his refusal to allow the American
people to see his tax returns.
In
doing so, Clinton did Americans a big favor: she revealed Trump's
limitations. He is simply unable to make those leaps of imagination and
generosity necessary to transform from a businessperson to a national
political leader. The candidate who claims to do everything big showed
the smallness of his thinking tonight. With his off-key rejoinders, he
demonstrated repeatedly how he sees everything -- people, properties,
cities, and entire countries -- in terms of how they factor into his
business and personal universe, which seem to be one and the same. I'll
get to Pennsylvania Avenue one way or another, he said tonight, as
though the White House and his new Trump hotel are entities of equal
importance. Perhaps they really are, in his mind.
Clinton
alone demonstrated the composure, wisdom, and broad vision necessary
for executive office. She won the debate hands down.
Ruth
Ben-Ghiat is a professor of history and Italian studies at New York
University, a specialist in 20th-century European history and a frequent
contributor to CNN Opinion. Her latest book is "Italian Fascism's
Empire Cinema." She supports Hillary Clinton for the presidency.
Raul Reyes: A sad night for 'Sniffles'
The
reality TV star and businessman who loves giving nicknames earned
himself one tonight: "Sniffles." From the beginning through the end of
the first debate Donald Trump seemed to have something going on with his
sinuses. It seemed a fitting metaphor for a night on which the usual
expert showman was seriously off his game. Besides the sniffles, Trump
made faces and sighed. He scowled. He interrupted. He took innumerable
drinks of water, something for which he used to mock Marco Rubio.
In
so doing, Trump lost this debate to a clearly up-to-the-task Hillary
Clinton. Either Trump failed to prepare, or his prep sessions did not
stick.
This
is a debate that will likely be studied in college communications,
advertising, and gender courses for years to come. Without the benefit
of a live audience cheering his one-liners, Trump seemed deflated and
not on his best form at all. His constant interruptions of Clinton will
do him no favors with women voters. His bragging, in effect, about
forcing President Barack Obama to produce his birth certificate will not
go over well with black voters. And his rambling answers at times
descended into incoherence. In response to a question about
cybersecurity, he mentioned that cyberattacks could be coming from
"someone sitting on their bed weighing 400 pounds." Uh, what?
Clinton
did not let opportunities go by to score points with independents or
moderate voters, reminding viewers that Trump once saw the mortgage
crisis as a business opportunity, and she discussed race relations in
thoughtful terms. Meanwhile, Trump made truly bizarre statements, such
as she has been been fighting ISIS for 30 years! and "African-Americans
and Hispanics are living in hell, you walk down the streets, you get
shot." Note to Trump: Testiness is not a presidential look.
The
fact that at several points Trump was arguing with moderator Lester
Holt showed that things were not going his way. In one of the most
notable moments of the night, Trump's declaration that he had a much
better temperament than Clinton earned spontaneous laughter from the
audience at Hofstra University. As Trump might say: "Sad."
Unusual
omissions tonight: No mentions of Trump's feuds with everyone from a
distinguished Mexican-American judge to a Gold Star family. More
glaringly: no discussion of immigration.
Whether
viewers agree with Clinton's positions or not, she was able to
articulate them in a reasonable and rational manner. She did well, and
she knew it. She was obviously ready to discuss problematic issues like
her emails. The grin on her face near the end of the debate was evidence
that she was aware that she had had a great night. Once you've traveled
the world, negotiated treaties, and testified before Congress for 11
hours, she said to Trump with a hint of mockery, then "you can talk to
me about stamina." Mic drop. Game over. Tonight at least, Hillary
Clinton won.
Jeff Yang: Trump weaved his own hanging rope
This
was a remarkable moment in American political history. Has there been a
prior event in which a candidate has so completely and remarkably
demonstrated his unfitness for the presidency, in character,
temperament, preparation and aptitude?
Donald
Trump's now-familiar pattern of winning debates through sheer bluster
and braggadocio was effective when he was facing a gaggle of opponents,
all of whom had similar ideologies but less exaggerated stage personas.
But faced with a single rival with clearly distinct ideas and experience
and a staunchly unflappable attitude, he seemed rude, ignorant,
volatile and churlish. Despite pundit assertions that Hillary Clinton
had the burden of proof in this debate, the truth is that she simply
needed to hold strong and let Hurricane Trump blow itself out. And she
did.
Sadly,
moderator Lester Holt was a non-presence in the debate. But his
inability to restrain Trump proved an asset to Clinton, who spent much
of the time leaning back and smiling to herself, knowing that her
opponent was weaving his own hanging rope.
Sally Kohn: Trump train derailed
Donald
Trump's supporters like to refer to his movement as "The Trump Train."
Well, tonight The Trump Train went off the rails. Big time.
Admittedly,
to many observers, the train was already way off track. Maybe it
started the moment his campaign began, when he dismissed Mexican
immigrants as "rapists." Or maybe it was when he attacked Sen. John
McCain. Or later, when he attacked a Gold Star family. Certainly, many
Americans have paid attention to the media's attempts at fact checking
-- including one report that Trump only tells the truth 22% of the time, and another that found in five hours of talking, Trump outright lied an average of every 3 minutes and 15 seconds.
But
for those who somehow thought, up until Monday night, that Donald Trump
might somehow be qualified to be president, Monday's debate was a
wakeup call. He seemed like a defensive, petulant bully who could only
insult Hillary Clinton and America -- and couldn't offer a single
solution, let alone details. He came across as not only dreadfully
unprepared for the debate, but dreadfully unprepared to be president.
Which is the truth. And it's high time all Americans know it.
But don't believe me. I'm obviously biased. Believe Frank Luntz. In his live focus group
of undecided and leaning voters, just six people thought Trump won
while 16 said Clinton was the victor. In moment after moment, the focus
group preferred Clinton. For instance, Clinton's response to Trump's
attack on her stamina scored better than Trump's attack. And Hillary's plan to defeat ISIS actually scored better with the Trump leaners in the group than with the Clinton leaners.
In
moment after moment, Hillary Clinton presented a knowledgeable and
clear-eyed vision for how to help working families and continue America
on the path to security and prosperity. Donald Trump, in contrast, lied,
and got defensive. He was petty and insulting, and then lied some more.
Lies apparently can only get the Trump train so far. Eventually it runs
out of steam.
Hillary Clinton
showed herself to be the kind of person you want in the White House.
And Donald Trump showed himself to be the kind of kindergartner who
should have his train taken away and instead given a timeout.










0 comments: